"Oct. 10 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. exchanges may seek to impose a temporary ban on short sales for individual stocks that plunge... Under the plan, a stock that ends trading with a loss of at least 20 percent would be protected from short sellers for the following three days, the people said..."
So... hmm... if I am shorting the hell out of a name, even if I only started when it was already down 8-10%, and it starts to get to maybe 15 or 16% down on the day, I would probably slow my short selling right down or even start to cover some or all of the position under this 20%/3day ruling - so yes, that might actually work. Yay! Then my bear-raiding buddies and I can whack it again the next day for another 15-16% and the following day for another 15-16%. Cool.
Oh, wait... But what if I want to squeeze the short sellers that have smacked down a stock I am holding in my portfolio by 15-16%... What would I do? Well, towards the close, I might go and sell the hell out of it to get it to breach the 20% fall for the day limit and then pile in long the next few days to force the shorts to cover under the 3 day ban.
It may not even be a name I already hold - I could short sell just enough to force it through the 20% mark and then cover quickly and pile in long as above.
Of course, I may actually fail to get it down more than 20%, since as a short squeezer trying to drive the stock up, I will be shorting hard into a lot of buying by bears covering their shorts that day so they can drive it down on following days (you following this?) So if I don't get it trading more than 20% down, I can still enjoy the ride, i.e. make money on my short the next day and decide what to do later.
Neat. We need a bit more volatility and uncertainty in this market to keep things interesting.
.
::
Stumble It!
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment